Post by bgaede on Dec 7, 2009 2:33:29 GMT -5
I come from a militant atheist home. We used to ambush 'bible sellers' at the door and tear them to pieces. You know. The standard stuff: "Who created God?", "How can Jesus save you if he couldn't save himself?", "Do you really believe that Jonah was swallowed by a fish and then spit out three days later?"
But now there is a much more formidable enemy on the horizon than traditional religion and that's the enemy I attack today. He is the atheistic 'scientist', an individual who styles himself a 'physicist' when he is but a mathematician, an idiot of the establishment, a priest of the modern Dark Ages. This individual is an obstacle to progress because he thinks he can prove matters of existence and declares them as fact. He has replaced the traditional faith in the existence of God with faith in the existence of a concept called spacetime or faith in the existence of zero-dimensional particles, 1D strings, black holes, particles of mass, warped space, you name it! Traditional religion has been superceded by the more ominous religion of Mathematical Physics.
In Science, it is just as ludicrous to believe in the existence of God as it is to believe in the non-existence of God. In Science, existence is not an issue of theory, but of assumptions. We don't prove the existence of God any more than we prove the non-existence of God or of THIS chair. This chair exists (or not) BY DEFINITION. The Scientific Method compels the presenter to define the word EXIST, a word that not one mathematician, not one philosopher, not one theist has ever defined and which is at the root of the centuries-old debate.
The ONLY way to use the word 'exist' consistently (i.e., scientifically) in a discussion is to define it as:
exist: physical presence
The 'physical' part invokes an object (that which has shape). The presence part alludes to 'location'. An object that exists is one which IN ADDITION has location (the set of distances between it and the remaining matter in the Universe). This chair exists IFF it is an object AND has location.
The ‘physical presence’ definition summarily denies existence to ALL concepts. Concepts such as love, justice, conscience, etc., do not have shape. All concepts were invented by Man. Thus, the ideal cube is an object that does not exist. It has shape, yet no location. THIS chair has shape AND location. It exists BY DEFINITION.
The great debate about God can be resolved very easily. Is God an object (has shape) or is God a concept (lacks shape)? Is God artificial or was God 'there' before we came aboard? God cannot HAVE and NOT HAVE shape simultaneously. The proponent is attempting to cover all the bases to render his theory unfalsifiable. Either God ‘IS’ an anthropomorphic being with hands and eyes or God ‘IS’ Love and Grace. It can't be both. The nature of God determines whether God exists pursuant to the definition. The ball is in the presenter's court. What does 'God' mean for the purposes of HIS theory? Did the concept Love create the Universe? Did the abstract concept Intelligence make Adam from mud? Who should we pray to, Grace or the guy who sits his butt on the throne?
The atheistic 'scientific' establishment is in the same predicament. Does the concept energy exist? Does the concept mass exist? Does it make sense to say that a particle 'carries a force' or that space is warped?
Pursuant to the definition of exist, space does not exist because 'it' is not a physical object. Not one person can draw a picture of space. Therefore, it is irrational to say that space is warped, and this alone destroys the ludicrous religion known as General Relativity that everyone bought on the basis of authority.
Likewise, it is irrational to claim that a 0D particle 'exists' in the accelerator or that 'it' annihilated with another 0D particle. The religion known as Quantum Mechanics believed by practically every atheist graduating from college is a much greater threat to the rational mind than God could ever hope to be. In Science, we don't 'transfer energy', 'move a mass', 'carry a force', 'dilate time', accelerate 'a' charge thru 'a' field, or cross inexistent boundaries known as event horizons. The garbage that the atheistic 'scientists' have passed on from generation to generation in colleges around the world since the start of the 20th Century is the new version of 'Evil' we live with today. The mathematicians of the world who call themselves 'physicists' have become stupid from indulging on too many fruits from the Tree of Knowledge.
If you believe in any of the irrational explanations of contemporary 'science' -- spacetime, warped space, black hole, time dilation, energy transfer, force carriers, dark energy, Big Bang, 1D string, 0D particle, wave-packet, massless photon, Higgs Boson -- then you are NOT an atheist. You have been blind-sided, misled, brainwashed to believe one nonsense rather than another. You have replaced supernatural traditional religion with the irrational religion of Math Phyz. The enemy is no longer God. The enemy is now at the LHC, at LIGO, at GPB, and at Cambridge and Stanford 'Physics' Departments.
Bill Gaede
The religion of Math Phyz: www.youstupidrelativist.com
Einstein's Idiots: www.youtube.com/user/bgaede
Why God Doesn't Exist: www.lulu.com/content/7436620
Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gaede
But now there is a much more formidable enemy on the horizon than traditional religion and that's the enemy I attack today. He is the atheistic 'scientist', an individual who styles himself a 'physicist' when he is but a mathematician, an idiot of the establishment, a priest of the modern Dark Ages. This individual is an obstacle to progress because he thinks he can prove matters of existence and declares them as fact. He has replaced the traditional faith in the existence of God with faith in the existence of a concept called spacetime or faith in the existence of zero-dimensional particles, 1D strings, black holes, particles of mass, warped space, you name it! Traditional religion has been superceded by the more ominous religion of Mathematical Physics.
In Science, it is just as ludicrous to believe in the existence of God as it is to believe in the non-existence of God. In Science, existence is not an issue of theory, but of assumptions. We don't prove the existence of God any more than we prove the non-existence of God or of THIS chair. This chair exists (or not) BY DEFINITION. The Scientific Method compels the presenter to define the word EXIST, a word that not one mathematician, not one philosopher, not one theist has ever defined and which is at the root of the centuries-old debate.
The ONLY way to use the word 'exist' consistently (i.e., scientifically) in a discussion is to define it as:
exist: physical presence
The 'physical' part invokes an object (that which has shape). The presence part alludes to 'location'. An object that exists is one which IN ADDITION has location (the set of distances between it and the remaining matter in the Universe). This chair exists IFF it is an object AND has location.
The ‘physical presence’ definition summarily denies existence to ALL concepts. Concepts such as love, justice, conscience, etc., do not have shape. All concepts were invented by Man. Thus, the ideal cube is an object that does not exist. It has shape, yet no location. THIS chair has shape AND location. It exists BY DEFINITION.
The great debate about God can be resolved very easily. Is God an object (has shape) or is God a concept (lacks shape)? Is God artificial or was God 'there' before we came aboard? God cannot HAVE and NOT HAVE shape simultaneously. The proponent is attempting to cover all the bases to render his theory unfalsifiable. Either God ‘IS’ an anthropomorphic being with hands and eyes or God ‘IS’ Love and Grace. It can't be both. The nature of God determines whether God exists pursuant to the definition. The ball is in the presenter's court. What does 'God' mean for the purposes of HIS theory? Did the concept Love create the Universe? Did the abstract concept Intelligence make Adam from mud? Who should we pray to, Grace or the guy who sits his butt on the throne?
The atheistic 'scientific' establishment is in the same predicament. Does the concept energy exist? Does the concept mass exist? Does it make sense to say that a particle 'carries a force' or that space is warped?
Pursuant to the definition of exist, space does not exist because 'it' is not a physical object. Not one person can draw a picture of space. Therefore, it is irrational to say that space is warped, and this alone destroys the ludicrous religion known as General Relativity that everyone bought on the basis of authority.
Likewise, it is irrational to claim that a 0D particle 'exists' in the accelerator or that 'it' annihilated with another 0D particle. The religion known as Quantum Mechanics believed by practically every atheist graduating from college is a much greater threat to the rational mind than God could ever hope to be. In Science, we don't 'transfer energy', 'move a mass', 'carry a force', 'dilate time', accelerate 'a' charge thru 'a' field, or cross inexistent boundaries known as event horizons. The garbage that the atheistic 'scientists' have passed on from generation to generation in colleges around the world since the start of the 20th Century is the new version of 'Evil' we live with today. The mathematicians of the world who call themselves 'physicists' have become stupid from indulging on too many fruits from the Tree of Knowledge.
If you believe in any of the irrational explanations of contemporary 'science' -- spacetime, warped space, black hole, time dilation, energy transfer, force carriers, dark energy, Big Bang, 1D string, 0D particle, wave-packet, massless photon, Higgs Boson -- then you are NOT an atheist. You have been blind-sided, misled, brainwashed to believe one nonsense rather than another. You have replaced supernatural traditional religion with the irrational religion of Math Phyz. The enemy is no longer God. The enemy is now at the LHC, at LIGO, at GPB, and at Cambridge and Stanford 'Physics' Departments.
Bill Gaede
The religion of Math Phyz: www.youstupidrelativist.com
Einstein's Idiots: www.youtube.com/user/bgaede
Why God Doesn't Exist: www.lulu.com/content/7436620
Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gaede