Post by EdwardSmith on Feb 23, 2005 18:50:19 GMT -5
How To Rapidly Identify Theocrats And Anti-Theocrats
Psychologically, theocrats are best described as 'factionalists', being
classified with fascists, fanatical traditionalists, and others as having the
desire to serve an abstract entity in a symbolic fashion to the large
substantial detriment of the whole of society, due to an intentional
blindness to empathy with the whole of society.
Factionalism is psychologically characterized by thorough malice,
malice being defined as the desire to perceive and do wrongly.
Wrongness is synonymous with inaccuracy, blindness, and crudeness,
as the more wrongly a person perceives, the more information that they
blind themself to, beginning with the finest information and proceeding
to increasing crudeness. Empathy with all beings is caused by fine,
goodwilled perception, as beings that are unlucky are characterized by
the abstract trait of subtlety, and beings that are victims of other beings
are abstractly characterized by being defined from their victimizers,
and subtlety and definition are the 2 multiplicative factors of fineness,
as is described in the webpage at the following URL:
www.cotse.net/users/t3nj/ctlg.html
Theocrats and other factionalists blind themselves to BOTH factors of
fineness.
Those same fundamental manners of perceiving reality are also
expressed in facial expression, tone of voice, and other ways, and that
fact can be applied to rapidly identify theocrats, people that are similar
to theocrats, and anti-theocrats, so as to know who to trust and who not
to, who to help and who not to, and whose genes to pass on and whose
not to. More specificly, it can also be applied to know which products
and services to buy and which to boycott, due to the facial expressions
and tones of voice that are used in the advertisements thereof. Said
malicious facial expressions and tones of voice indicate that a person is a
fanatic, though they do not SPECIFICALLY indicate that they are a
theocrat, but fanatics of any kind have much in common with theocrats
and can easily become theocrats, as they are psychologically identical or
nearly-identical.
In addition to the politically-defined factionalists like the theocrats, who
have a work ethic, there are also many thoroughly-malicious people that
have a play ethic, who may be called play-ethic fanatics. Such play-ethic
fanatics, like the factionalists, create a large burden upon people that
gives no substantial benefit, although the burden that they impose is more
disorganized and chaotic. Some major behaviors of play-ethic fanaticism
are disturbing the peace via loud vulgar music, college hazings,
harassment of civilized people, and chaos in general (chaos is a fruitless
burden, just like dedication to a non-existent god). The fanatical
factionalists are undoubtably much more dangerous than the play-ethic
fanatics though, as they much more often step outside the bounds of
their social circle and impose their malice on society at large.
The observable expressions of fanatical character are as follows:
In facial expressions, crude focus is expressed in the enlargement of the
facial expression, such that the eyebrows are raised, the upper eyelids
are raised, and the lips are widened in both dimensions (not just with a
regular reflexive cheek-tightening smile, but much more so). In contrast,
fine focus is expressed in the shrinking of the facial expression, such that
the eyebrows are scrunched and lowered, the eyelids are squinted, and
the lips are not widened.
In vocal expressions, the crude focus is expressed in the nature of the
soundwaves of the tone of voice, which is in turn caused by the formation
of the back of the mouth. Obviously, humans can not directly perceive
the form of a soundwave, but tones of voice can be abstractly
characterized, and the tone of voice of fanatics is characterized by
sounding 'expanding' or 'progressing toward hollowness'. In contrast, the
tone of voice that characterizes fine focus is characterized by sounding
'progressing toward fineness'.
Malicious people in general can also be identified by their method of
argument (regardless of what they are arguing for or against), as
malicious people use various communicative tactics which serve to
deprecate and/or misinterpret the words of their opponents so as to
distract from honest logic, such as by falsely portraying the act of
describing the truth-avoiding communicative tactics as a method of
curtailing honest argument. Most of such tactics are listed in the
webpage at the following URL:
www.cotse.net/users/t3nj/ttcs.html
Not all malicious people are fanatics though, as a person can have only
one of the 2 factors of malice (fanatics have both).
Psychologically, theocrats are best described as 'factionalists', being
classified with fascists, fanatical traditionalists, and others as having the
desire to serve an abstract entity in a symbolic fashion to the large
substantial detriment of the whole of society, due to an intentional
blindness to empathy with the whole of society.
Factionalism is psychologically characterized by thorough malice,
malice being defined as the desire to perceive and do wrongly.
Wrongness is synonymous with inaccuracy, blindness, and crudeness,
as the more wrongly a person perceives, the more information that they
blind themself to, beginning with the finest information and proceeding
to increasing crudeness. Empathy with all beings is caused by fine,
goodwilled perception, as beings that are unlucky are characterized by
the abstract trait of subtlety, and beings that are victims of other beings
are abstractly characterized by being defined from their victimizers,
and subtlety and definition are the 2 multiplicative factors of fineness,
as is described in the webpage at the following URL:
www.cotse.net/users/t3nj/ctlg.html
Theocrats and other factionalists blind themselves to BOTH factors of
fineness.
Those same fundamental manners of perceiving reality are also
expressed in facial expression, tone of voice, and other ways, and that
fact can be applied to rapidly identify theocrats, people that are similar
to theocrats, and anti-theocrats, so as to know who to trust and who not
to, who to help and who not to, and whose genes to pass on and whose
not to. More specificly, it can also be applied to know which products
and services to buy and which to boycott, due to the facial expressions
and tones of voice that are used in the advertisements thereof. Said
malicious facial expressions and tones of voice indicate that a person is a
fanatic, though they do not SPECIFICALLY indicate that they are a
theocrat, but fanatics of any kind have much in common with theocrats
and can easily become theocrats, as they are psychologically identical or
nearly-identical.
In addition to the politically-defined factionalists like the theocrats, who
have a work ethic, there are also many thoroughly-malicious people that
have a play ethic, who may be called play-ethic fanatics. Such play-ethic
fanatics, like the factionalists, create a large burden upon people that
gives no substantial benefit, although the burden that they impose is more
disorganized and chaotic. Some major behaviors of play-ethic fanaticism
are disturbing the peace via loud vulgar music, college hazings,
harassment of civilized people, and chaos in general (chaos is a fruitless
burden, just like dedication to a non-existent god). The fanatical
factionalists are undoubtably much more dangerous than the play-ethic
fanatics though, as they much more often step outside the bounds of
their social circle and impose their malice on society at large.
The observable expressions of fanatical character are as follows:
In facial expressions, crude focus is expressed in the enlargement of the
facial expression, such that the eyebrows are raised, the upper eyelids
are raised, and the lips are widened in both dimensions (not just with a
regular reflexive cheek-tightening smile, but much more so). In contrast,
fine focus is expressed in the shrinking of the facial expression, such that
the eyebrows are scrunched and lowered, the eyelids are squinted, and
the lips are not widened.
In vocal expressions, the crude focus is expressed in the nature of the
soundwaves of the tone of voice, which is in turn caused by the formation
of the back of the mouth. Obviously, humans can not directly perceive
the form of a soundwave, but tones of voice can be abstractly
characterized, and the tone of voice of fanatics is characterized by
sounding 'expanding' or 'progressing toward hollowness'. In contrast, the
tone of voice that characterizes fine focus is characterized by sounding
'progressing toward fineness'.
Malicious people in general can also be identified by their method of
argument (regardless of what they are arguing for or against), as
malicious people use various communicative tactics which serve to
deprecate and/or misinterpret the words of their opponents so as to
distract from honest logic, such as by falsely portraying the act of
describing the truth-avoiding communicative tactics as a method of
curtailing honest argument. Most of such tactics are listed in the
webpage at the following URL:
www.cotse.net/users/t3nj/ttcs.html
Not all malicious people are fanatics though, as a person can have only
one of the 2 factors of malice (fanatics have both).