|
Post by Yaw on Jan 1, 2004 23:02:24 GMT -5
If I may make a suggestion, it would be nice if people playing would post something in this thread. You know, just to let us all know you're alive and still interested in being involved. It doesn't have to be anything substantial -- how much you contribute to the game is up to you. But it would be nice to know if we need to track players down or find replacements.
AuntieSocial
What are you saying, exactly? We all know the roles in this game, and without any information-acquiring roles or a night 1, you can't possibly know anything about kaeis. If it's a random accusation, I can respect that. But insinuating that there's something behind it seems odd -- the only ways you would know anything about kaeis would be if you both were siblings or if you were scum. In the former case, you wouldn't be trying to make him seem suspicious, because a lynch would kill you too. In the latter case, you'd know about kaeis because he was either on your side or not, and if he were on your side, you probably wouldn't want to make him seem suspicious right off the bat.
It might be a mistake, and it's not quite enough to even merit a finger of suspicion from me. But it has raised my eyebrows...
|
|
|
Post by ck on Jan 1, 2004 23:58:01 GMT -5
HI everybody... To get things started.... um.... I think nonny's mafia. And me. No I'm not! Yes I am. I vote for myself. Oh yeah? Well I vote for myself! *ahem* carry on. k I forgive myself /unvote me /unvote me IM voting for pieisgood well cause of his first vote and he is acting very suspicious.... Vote:pieisgood
|
|
|
Post by nonny on Jan 2, 2004 0:47:34 GMT -5
pieisgood: (1) ck muddog: (1) pieisgood ck: (1) Yaw
BTW i just have to comment ck temple is a jewish thing only.
|
|
|
Post by Arutha on Jan 2, 2004 6:34:57 GMT -5
I would like to point out that the other game is in no way related to this, so the status of ck in the former game should have no relivence, however simply voting for yaw would make my move as stupid as his, and vengence is always healthy, however i agree with ck and think pieisgood IS acting strange so in waiting for something better to decide on i vote pieisgood however i think yaw should change his vote
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jan 2, 2004 11:55:54 GMT -5
1) You must not know me very well. I'm always strange. And I always do that whenever I play mafia. mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=32232#32232I'm pie_is_good over there; totally different game and I'm still doing the same thing. I'm keeping my vote. If I were scum, I'd be trying to get you two lynched for accusing me.
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jan 2, 2004 12:06:07 GMT -5
Also: to yaw's post
I don't believe that fingers can be pointed at AuntieSocial yet just because she made a random accusation. That's what the first lynching is, really- completely random. However, it did start to make me think that you are NOT mafia. Assuming that you are mafia, it's a fairly obvious part of mafia not to put yourself under the limelight. If you're not mafia, you would be more concerned about getting scum lynched than your own life.
|
|
|
Post by nonny on Jan 2, 2004 12:17:04 GMT -5
Ok, pieisgood try to keep the comments inside this game.
pieisgood: (2) ck, arutha muddog: (1) pieisgood ck: (1) Yaw
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Jan 2, 2004 12:26:53 GMT -5
First of all, my voting for ck was random. Just a conversation starter. I was joking when I said it was because he was scum the last time -- hence the winky smiley. I will change my vote in the future if and when someone actually looks suspicious, or if ck gets too close to a quick lynch.
I don't see pieisgood's first post as being particularly suspicious, more amusing. I do note that ck misrepresented his vote -- only bold votes count, so pieisgood's first vote was for muddog, not himself. Could just be a misunderstanding, though.
As for pieisgood's comments...
First of all, when noting what AuntieSocial did I wasn't concerned about a random accusation -- I expect random accusations. How the hell else are we going to start conversing and generating enough information about people's actions to get scum lynched? It was the insinuation that there was more to the random accusation than just a random accusation that makes me wonder.
I also do realize that I'm making myself a good night kill target right now. Judging by the last game, though, if someone isn't pretty active in starting to get people to dissect and analyze the comments of others, it won't get done and we'll essentially be lynching randomly. My hope is that others get busy and start doing this sort of analysis on their own publicly, in order to avoid hanging me out to dry. If multiple people are doing it, it's better for the town (more chance of lynching scum), and it'll give the Catholics problems figuring out who to kill, instead of quickly offing me. It's a calculated risk.
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jan 2, 2004 13:46:37 GMT -5
sorry again, nonny.
ck and Arutha: How am I acting suspicious? Maybe you're just bandwagoning with me against me.
Arutha: Why do you think Yaw should change his vote? If you two vote the same place and protect each other, that seems somewhat scummy to me.
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jan 2, 2004 17:39:18 GMT -5
Has the policeman/woman investigated anybody yet?
|
|
|
Post by nonny on Jan 2, 2004 20:15:55 GMT -5
There is no policeman/woman. Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Arutha on Jan 2, 2004 20:36:53 GMT -5
Well judging on chance the probibility for Ck to be Mafia 2 times in a row out of 10 people using a random generated number is fairly slim, i am going on that, also pointing a finger at yourself even jokingly would normally make people ignore you and turn the heat off yourself, something i see as a catholic thing
p.s its a nice bandwagon wanna ride?
|
|
|
Post by Griffey on Jan 2, 2004 21:00:03 GMT -5
I'm not dead yet, just sleepy...
pieisgood, you seem to be on the defensive. Might that be scummy guilt? Although, ck, I hardly think voting for one's self is a suspicous act. Inane maybe, but not what I'd call particuarly suspicious. It just looks to me like you're trying to draw attention away from yourself and onto a "bandwagon" to avoid detection.
Then again I'm picking up a few contradictions that seem very suspicous: pieisgood, you say it's obvious for mafia members "not to put yourself in the limelight," although your first post was certainly an attention-getter. Trying to throw us off your trail? And saying that Auntie's random vote showed you that she wasn't mafia, when in fact you also voted randomly? Association with a similar situation to make yourself inadvertantly look innocent. Hmm. Well, I myself didn't find Auntie's post particuarly self-pardoning, but now that you connect your two posts like that, you both look quite suspicious to me.
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jan 2, 2004 22:08:17 GMT -5
Ouch. that hurts, non.
let the meeting commence
OLD BUISNESS: Griffey- Yes, I am on the defensive. If I accused you of being scum, would you just say "yeah, maybe, but I think it's [insert random name here]"? Of course I defend muself. I admit that that is the kind of thing scum would do, but it's also the kind of thing a citizen would do so that provides no evidence whatsoever.
What do you mean by bandwagoning? My vote is currently on muddog, and I am the only one.
If I was trying to throw you off my tail with contradicting statements, I would mention that they contradict instead of letting somebody else figure it out and having me look scummy.
I'm not saying at all that Auntie's random vote makes her look scummy; you misinterpreted my post. I'm saying that Yaw's disection of Auntie's post makes him look non-scummy. I stand by what I said: he is drawing attention to himself; not a smart thing to do if he is mafia, but it's so we can root out the scum that he's doing it. We citizens have strength in numbers, and trading a citizen's life for a mafia life is always worth it.
NEW BUISNESS: I have thought alot about this game today, and, for reasons I cannot say because it would only help the scum, I don't believe anybody here to be scum. I don't think that everybody that has so far posted is scum except-
griffey -and- AuntieSocial
You two haven't posted enough to be ruled out or ruled in yet.
-pieisgood
|
|
|
Post by Griffey on Jan 2, 2004 23:13:39 GMT -5
I think our wires mighta got crossed here. pieisgood, I was actually talking to ck about the bandwagon thing, I do realize that you are the only muddog voter. And I guess I did misinterpret your post there...it makes more sense now, although I'm sorry to say you still look a bit suspicious to me.
Hopefully more people will get here soon, though, where is everyone?
|
|