|
Post by Yaw on Jul 22, 2004 14:13:56 GMT -5
Enjoying yourself? This is sort of distracting from finding scum, but then again, I'm already voting that way...
|
|
|
Post by Superhappyjen on Jul 22, 2004 21:31:26 GMT -5
Enjoying yourself? Yes I am. Thank you ;D This is sort of distracting from finding scum, but then again, I'm already voting that way... So when you vote randomly you are trying to distract from finding scum? I think I voted the right way. lol
|
|
|
Post by ck on Jul 23, 2004 9:14:04 GMT -5
I think its so stupid just throwing random vote after random vote. Just do one random vote.
|
|
|
Post by Griffey on Jul 23, 2004 10:22:21 GMT -5
Why, so it's less likely to land on you, ck?
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jul 23, 2004 10:54:22 GMT -5
Vote Count:
Superhappyjen: (1) Yaw
Narninian: (2) MMCL, Griffey
Yaw: (1) Superhappyjen
Benaih: (1) Auntiesocial
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jul 23, 2004 11:00:20 GMT -5
BTW: Beniah and Kalena have been prodded. They have 4 days to post before getting replaced.
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Jul 23, 2004 12:40:39 GMT -5
Well, Superhappyjen, random voting is fine for starting conversation. There comes a time, though, when you actually have to find the scum, which means voting based on more than just randomness. Voting randomly four times doesn't serve much purpose. In general, votes after the first one should be for non-random reasons.
Far more interesting -- two votes on Narninian. Any reason for that second vote, Griffey?
|
|
|
Post by Superhappyjen on Jul 23, 2004 14:57:32 GMT -5
Far more interesting -- two votes on Narninian. Any reason for that second vote, Griffey? I was wondering about that too. Has Narnian done something suspicious that I didn't pick up on, or is Griffey trying to vote out a townie?
|
|
|
Post by Griffey on Jul 23, 2004 17:15:42 GMT -5
Well "random" generally means "without purpose," unless it's changed since last I checked...
I just want to see him respond.
|
|
|
Post by AuntieSocial on Jul 24, 2004 6:04:36 GMT -5
I think I'll leave my random vote where it is for now, but I may move it shortly do get some conversation going...
It's so hard to get the momentum (and pressure) going when you start with day.
So, Narninian, any comments on the two votes on you?
|
|
|
Post by nonny on Jul 24, 2004 17:40:19 GMT -5
FoS jen- the randoms votes as yaw said are to get conversation started and are ussaully only seen as random the first time you do it. The thing about Griffey coming back after not being here in a month is just crap logic, I'm glad she did come back because it is a pain in the butt to find replacements on this board.
|
|
|
Post by AuntieSocial on Jul 24, 2004 18:28:42 GMT -5
For the new players - FOS means "Finger of Suspicion"
|
|
|
Post by Superhappyjen on Jul 25, 2004 7:22:42 GMT -5
FoS jen- the randoms votes as yaw said are to get conversation started and are ussaully only seen as random the first time you do it. The thing about Griffey coming back after not being here in a month is just crap logic, I'm glad she did come back because it is a pain in the butt to find replacements on this board. You're pointing the FoS at the wrong person, I assure you. Besides, I'm not voting Griffey anymore, I'm voting Yaw.
|
|
|
Post by ck on Jul 25, 2004 10:52:01 GMT -5
Vote: SuperHappyJen This is more random but jen you seem to be taking off a vote and voting for someone else periodically. Seems a little scummy in my eyes of view but that is just me.
|
|
|
Post by Narninian on Jul 25, 2004 18:26:02 GMT -5
sorry I havnt posted for a while, - I was on a trip to Niagra falls.
Im not too worried about the 2 votes on me - Nobody has a good reason for voting, so Im sure they wont stick (unless somebody DOES come up with a reason).
Making every post a new 'random' doesnt really help - it doesnt really hurt either - just delays the game a bit.
|
|