|
Post by BaalShemRa on Mar 13, 2004 12:01:06 GMT -5
Hi, I'm the new one. Are the dead allowed to keep posting? Oh, Vote Yaw
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Mar 13, 2004 12:14:56 GMT -5
Welcome, BaalShemRa...
Does this mean you're caught up? Or are you voting me for the hell of it?
Anyway, we've been sort of liberal with the dead thing thus far, but the dead are definitely NOT allowed to post any information after death (whether killed by mafia or killed by lynching). If you're dead, you can't influence the game anymore.
Other big rules are: Don't EVER edit posts. Double-post if you have to. Don't quote the mod's PMs. Let people know if you'll be away for a long period of time.
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Mar 13, 2004 12:15:42 GMT -5
Oh, and does this mean BaalShemRa has his role from ck yet? Am I correct in assuming he's replacing Muddog?
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Mar 13, 2004 12:34:43 GMT -5
heya BSR. Good to see that you're here and posting.
Another FOS to non because of that last post not adressing anything taht I had just said. It seems like you're using the "I'm not scum because I'm not" argument, only here it's "I'm not stoping convorsation because I'm not". I needevidence before you expect me to believe you.
and... I'm assuming that vote on yaw was a random vote? or did he do something particularily scummy? Please say so either way, and if he did something scummy, point it out.
-pie
|
|
|
Post by BaalShemRa on Mar 13, 2004 16:24:55 GMT -5
Well, reading thread 4, I think Yaw isn't what you call "scum", so let's not lynch him. I was goofing off since he's the only one I know here.
Hilly, on the other hand, is the one who voted for lynching Yaw in the beginning. I say we investigate that.
It is in the mafia's interest thast Yaw get killed, so if he doesn't get killed at night, it's likely because they're trying to get him lynched.
|
|
|
Post by Hilly on Mar 13, 2004 17:21:26 GMT -5
Hilly, on the other hand, is the one who voted for lynching Yaw in the beginning. I say we investigate that. Hello BaalShemaRa, nice to see you here. As for my vote against Yaw, it was based solely on reverse alphabetical order. But it seems right now that it is nonbeliever that is doing the squirming.
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Mar 13, 2004 17:28:39 GMT -5
Yeah, I think a pressure bandwagon on nonbeliever is in order, as soon as we get everything verified by ck (including a vote count, please). What's happening with Acriku and r8thir? (Acriku surprises me, because he was quite active on the board before the game started. And when I put it that way, I'm a little bit worried... )
|
|
Kalena
Seasoned Citizen
Posts: 115
|
Post by Kalena on Mar 13, 2004 18:13:51 GMT -5
It is in the mafia's interest thast Yaw get killed, so if he doesn't get killed at night, it's likely because they're trying to get him lynched. ?? The mafia is only interested in killing innocents and we do not know if Yaw is an innocent or not. How would you know that the mafia in interested in killing Yaw? Unless you think Hilly is scum?
|
|
|
Post by nonny on Mar 13, 2004 18:42:57 GMT -5
I think( not to brown nose) but on this message board our two best players are Auntiesocial and Yaw, so the mafia obvisly want to get rid of yaw. Pieisgood i have no defense to give, because I am not guilty what else do you want me to say?
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Mar 13, 2004 18:51:40 GMT -5
I think you give Pieisgood too little credit, nonbeliever. He's pretty good. BaalShemRa -- you can unvote, you know. It consists of bolding your "unvote" like you would a vote. It's also recommended that you unvote and revote when changing your vote so someone else. Like this: Unvote: dingleberry12286, Vote: nonbelieverWhich I fully intend to do, by the way. I'm getting tired of the game stalling, and getting a bit of pressure on isn't going to be that dangerous with six to lynch. I trust everyone has the sense not to put more than four votes on at this time. And hey, we can always have the game stall when we get to that point.
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Mar 13, 2004 19:25:48 GMT -5
;D thanks Yaw. I will help pressure with a Vote: Nonbeleiver as well, although I can hardly see 2 votes getting anywhere. Non, I want to know what is wrong with my logic there. What's wrong with the argument against you. If we provide a case for you being scum, and you say "I'm not scum", then you have done nothing to help presuade us of your innocence. I want logic, not "I'm not scum, what do you want me to say?" If we based our lynch on that, EVERYBODY would claim town, so where are we then? *waits for replacements* Ah, BSR... the joys of random votes Be careful, though, and be sure to be liberal with the "unvote" if neccesary. I could easily see the scum shooting for Yaw tonight... he has an eye for scum it seems. Then it stands to reason that the doctor would protect him, so who knows what the scum might do. I would go for a doc saving Yaw tonight, tho. He seems the most vulnerable. well, there's my 2 cents. -pie
|
|
|
Post by nonny on Mar 13, 2004 20:15:03 GMT -5
Yes Pieisgood is also a very good player, sorry i left you out of my statment earlier.
Ok pieisgood, point taken i will make a defense after i read through the thread again. To refreash my memory.
|
|
|
Post by ck on Mar 13, 2004 20:58:33 GMT -5
ok pretty much BaelShemRa is replacing Muddog... and i will post the votes so far in a sec...
|
|
|
Post by ck on Mar 13, 2004 21:02:28 GMT -5
Votes so far Pieisgood [1] (dingleberry12286) Yaw [2] (hilly) (arutha) nonbeliever [2] (Yaw) (pieisgood)
I believe that is accurate...
IM gonna set a deadline soon i still haven't decided on a date though..
|
|
|
Post by BaalShemRa on Mar 13, 2004 21:40:56 GMT -5
Unvote Hilly, Vote nonbeliever
Pie's convinced me, I trust Yaw and nonbeliever hasn't defended himself.
|
|