The unmovable first mover

[Dragon*of*Heaven]

Hello all. Well I am currently attending a catholic college and being as I have a wealth of info at my disposal I did some searching. What I found is one of the most basic statements that allows the faithful to prove to themselves that a god exists.

.... The unmovable first mover is one both in definition and in number; so too, therefore, is that which is moved always and continuously; therefore there is one heaven alone.)

By this statement one can make a map showing the effect. 'A' representing the unmoved mover, subsequent letters representing the actions by the first.

A>B>C>D>E>F>G......

No matter what if one looked to the bigging one would find 'A' or the "unmoved mover". I asked about another possible outcome of which I was accused of using circular logic. My statement is as follows: The end result of an action is the reason for its action. Ergo the first is moved by its own action. Or to be better put A>B>C>D>A (where as A is the cause of A) resulting in A>B>C>D>A>B>C>D>A....... A circle would better put this. Another way to put it would be: I move a chair (A) resulting in: to put it where i want it (B) A there for being the reason for the action to begin with.

What do you guys think? Am I totally off my rocker?

[vertigo]

That statement says nothing more than that we classify things by their differences. We differentiate between the mover and the moved. I am forced to ask: so what?

We can't perceive the supernatural by definition, so this statement about perception has nothing to do with it.

You move a chair because you want to move the chair. The desire comes before the action.

[Dragon*of*Heaven]

oh yeah you put up a good point vertigo I dont know why I did not see it. thank you ^!^