|
Post by Dragon*of*Heaven on Feb 8, 2005 23:42:09 GMT -5
I dont think certian things in the christian faiths add up. For instance I am not naive i do realize that Hell is in all probablility a place (or as it is taught in catholic school a state of being)that was thought up to scare children and the easaliy frightend. However my question is not on if it is true. Instead it is on were it true wouldent that be a bit cruel. I mean lets talk numbers: the absolute maximum at this date that a person can live medicaly is around 130 year old before the body gives out altogether. Now lets be optomistic and say that every one lives that long. So then what christianity is saying is that My eternity is based off of 130 years? Im sorry but i find that a bit crule.
|
|
|
Post by necroshine on Feb 9, 2005 7:04:04 GMT -5
Where did you get 130? First off you can not be held responsible for what you do as a child. Plus most people only live to about 70 not 130. Now when you take away 12 I think that is the age of ascension if that is what they call it. take that away for 70 then you have 58. Now if god decides to take you out at lets say 22 (just to keep things easy) that is 10 years to hold you up to forever. I have never thought about this. don’t know why? But it is a good point. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Dragon*of*Heaven on Feb 9, 2005 23:09:22 GMT -5
well the 130 comes from a medical standered on the maximum possibility of a persons age. Other than to give an idea of a maximum it serves no real purpous. So yes I could have deleted that portion.
You have a good point about the other part yes bringing the age down only makes it even worse dosnt it. Glad to be of use.
|
|