|
Post by necroshine on Aug 20, 2005 15:27:10 GMT -5
Does someone know a virgin that wants to have a kid? Tell them to go get artificially inseminated. The woman would be a virgin and the baby would have to be a god! So anyone want to make a god?
|
|
|
Post by Dragon*of*Heaven on Aug 21, 2005 0:51:14 GMT -5
If you were joking it was a good joke. If you were being serious how ever you are a bit mistaken. The woman is technically not a virgin. This is because the vaginal walls have been penetrated in some way. Whether by a penis or a device if anything that produces semen enters into a womans vagina she is no longer a virgin.
(PS. Please forgive if I am being a bit of an jerk I'm not having a good morning thus far.)
|
|
|
Post by vertigo on Aug 21, 2005 6:37:07 GMT -5
The conception wouldn't have been immaculate. Actually, 'immaculate' is a value judgement, it presupposes that said conception is better than any other. It's nothing more than an opinion. You can't compare any other conception to it, because what made it immaculate was that God was incarnated.
It's a subtle trick they use. It sounds as though what makes it immaculate is the fact that no sex occured, but you know they don't mean that.
|
|
|
Post by necroshine on Aug 21, 2005 6:52:04 GMT -5
oh come on! lets make a god. this should work i tell you. i'm joking here, trying to have fun. what would we call him? Geezus of course he would have to be blue eyed and blond. Nothing less for a god. and of course he would have to be ripped. Can not have a fat slob sitting in an electric chair you know. But why should we kill him? have to have a stupid reason. I got it. we will kill him so the gas prices will go down. Oh me, I can see it now…..
|
|
|
Post by Dragon*of*Heaven on Aug 23, 2005 0:11:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Superhappyjen on Oct 22, 2005 11:46:34 GMT -5
I'm with you. Is there some way we could insert the spermies without penetrating her vaginal walls? Perhaps we could invent a transporter device and beam them in there. Of course we'll have to find a woman that has never used a tampon.
|
|
|
Post by vertigo on Oct 22, 2005 11:52:27 GMT -5
Way too much talk of vaginal walls and tampons here...
|
|
|
Post by Superhappyjen on Oct 23, 2005 10:12:15 GMT -5
Way too much talk of vaginal walls and tampons here... One mention of a feminine hygiene product and the boys go running for the hills.
|
|
|
Post by vertigo on Oct 23, 2005 10:54:19 GMT -5
Let's just say it doesn't make for polite discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Dragon*of*Heaven on Oct 23, 2005 17:17:50 GMT -5
Watch out vertigo your childish morality is showing. ^!~
|
|
|
Post by vertigo on Oct 23, 2005 18:24:27 GMT -5
I'm guessing that symbol at the end there is a face winking, and that you are not being serious.
I just don't particularly want to be thinking about why requiring a woman who has never used a tampon would be 'of course'. To tell you the truth, I could live happily ever after without ever knowing why that is. It doesn't concern me in the least. Mundane tasks that nature requires are typically not suitable for polite discussion, and really I don't see why anybody would want to discuss them.
Sex itself is a mundane task, it is not something I would ever care to discuss beyond why it isn't important. I don't think I'm being sexist. I typically don't talk about penises, vaginas or anything else like that. The human body is simply a mechanism wherein consciousness appears, there is nothing special about our bodies per se. Consciousness might have emerged a different way, as in a computer AI perhaps.
It could very well happen that in the future we create ourselves cybernetic bodies, especially if we are to outlive our planet. So really, what concerns me is what spans beyond the nature we find ourselves in. What concerns me most often spans the male/female divide.
But anyway, don't mind me. Feel free to continue, I have said what I wanted to say.
|
|
|
Post by Hilly on Oct 24, 2005 9:13:00 GMT -5
One mention of a feminine hygiene product and the boys go running for the hills. Nah, no problem here. Nice to see you back. Judging by your avatar it looks like congratulations are in order!
|
|
|
Post by Superhappyjen on Oct 24, 2005 13:38:40 GMT -5
One mention of a feminine hygiene product and the boys go running for the hills. Nah, no problem here. Nice to see you back. Judging by your avatar it looks like congratulations are in order! Thank you. Yup, I'm a Mrs. Now. Vertigo, I'm glad to see you're not sexist. I didn't realize that mention of tampons would cause you such offence. Personally, I think that people (not only you) are too prudish about their mundane functions. My instinct is that this is a result of religion. But that's another topic.
|
|
|
Post by vertigo on Oct 24, 2005 14:33:19 GMT -5
I find them icky. Strangely, I am not a clean-freak. I don't alphabetise my wardrobe, etc. In most other ways I am rather laid-back. I am not a very tidy person, however I have this dislike of nature. I suppose everyone has their niggles.
|
|
|
Post by Superhappyjen on Oct 25, 2005 8:59:25 GMT -5
You don't alphabetise your wardrobe? EW! ;D
|
|