|
|
Post by Supremor on Jan 7, 2004 15:51:07 GMT -5
I just wondered how you guys approach the design argument(qua purpose and qua order). It seems a tough nut to crack.
Write your suggestions and I'll give you mine later.
|
|
Acriku
Maverick's Chew Toy
I am the law.
Posts: 35
|
Post by Acriku on Jan 27, 2004 22:21:04 GMT -5
My best attempt at the moment would be pointing out the main points:
1) Even if the design argument is true, it doesn't prove which god, or if it was a god at all - perhaps a semipotent and semiscient alien species.
2) There's no real evidence to suggest design, as it is all speculative.
3) Phenomena occur that appear to be designed, but in reality they are naturally produced, e.g. snowflakes.
4) Phenomena that appear to be designed break down into considerably more simple patterns when magnified.
|
|
