|
Post by nonny on Jan 2, 2004 23:18:50 GMT -5
well i informed muddog. Besides that keais is the only one not here yet i believe. Well jacopo7531 hasn't posted either.
|
|
muddog
Maverick's Chew Toy
The blue things are books titles Plato, and the kid has a jar of Play-Doh
Posts: 29
|
Post by muddog on Jan 2, 2004 23:20:56 GMT -5
A complete random vote for me, eh? Ok, I'll buy that, but as I am completely innocent, I would like it if you could please remove your vote. It is rather uncomfortable being voted for, as other people tend to jump on the bandwagon.
|
|
muddog
Maverick's Chew Toy
The blue things are books titles Plato, and the kid has a jar of Play-Doh
Posts: 29
|
Post by muddog on Jan 2, 2004 23:38:44 GMT -5
after posting the comments above, and then reading, I guess my coments on the bandwagon are not unfounded. suprise suprise. I cannot tell, but I dont thing anyone talking is a mafia/catholic whatever. By the way, can someone post something on the grand inquisition so I can have some background on the point of catholics and jews?
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Jan 3, 2004 1:01:55 GMT -5
Actually, to those commenting about it, AuntieSocial didn't even vote. She just posted an insinuation that kaeis was scummy with crappy backing. It may be an honest mistake...or it may be a scummy move to try to get kaeis lynched without looking like she was perpetrating it. It's hard to tell without her posting more.
Which brings me to my point. I've been watching the board's "stalker bar" a bit to see who has been to the board while the game's on, and as far as I've seen kaeis is the only one unaware that we're playing. I do hope he gets here soon, but since nonbeliever's aware of his absence I'm not concerned. AuntieSocial and ck are the two players thus far who seem to be flying under the radar the most -- very few posts, very little content. Might be scummy, or might not have had time to post over the past little while. Again, I can't tell without seeing more from them. Worse than that, I have seen jacopo7531 logged into this message board, and he hasn't posted yet. So I'm going to Unvote: ck, and Vote: jacopo7531. Consider this vote a notice to POST SOMETHING, DAMMIT!
|
|
|
Post by Arutha on Jan 3, 2004 5:08:38 GMT -5
Hey, i got a good seat on the bandwagon, and until i see another one that looks more mafiaish i shall stay on this one, I just hope that this game that we can win over the mafia and weed them out, it will just take a little more thought into votes once the game gets going
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jan 3, 2004 10:37:04 GMT -5
muddog: yes, I will. I voted for you because an inactive citizen is absolutly no help to us. but since you're back... unvote: muddog
vote: keais just to spread around the inactivity votes
|
|
|
Post by nonny on Jan 3, 2004 12:20:36 GMT -5
pieisgood: (2) ck, arutha jacopo7531: (1) Yaw kaeis: (1) pieisgood
I'm going to try and tell kaeis that the game begun some how.
|
|
|
Post by ck on Jan 3, 2004 14:25:46 GMT -5
Im almost certain piesgood is part of the mafia. He gets defensive about every little thing and keeps trying to get votes away from him.... Its so obvious he is in a panic
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jan 3, 2004 15:23:15 GMT -5
*starts smacking head* This is how I play mafia!!!! Call it defensive, but it's nothing out of the ordinary. I am very desperate not to get lynched because I have figured out alot of this game. I wish I could announce it, but for the good of the citizens I won't. I don't believe that you are scum because you aren't going in bandwagons of 3. I am going in bandwagons of 1, and I could have easily followed Yaw earlier and voted for ck, who's accusing me, achieving a citizen lynched and somebody off my tail at the same time. But I didn't, because I didn't think you're mafia.
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Jan 3, 2004 18:03:59 GMT -5
While you're giving kaeis a poke about this game, nonbeliever, could you give jacopo7531 a poke as well? He was just signed into the board (now gone) and still hasn't posted anything in here. With two inactives, I'm a bit worried about that deadline...
My vote's staying until I see either content or the intent to provide content from him. It looks a bit too lurkerish to me right now. He may or may not be scum, but regardless, inactivity is bad for the game.
Also, I don't get the pieisgood-wagon. I'm not seeing him as particularly suspicious right now -- in fact, I'm seeing his accusers (ck and Arutha) as more suspicious because they're bandwagoning him without posting much content to back up a lynch. I'm open to changing my vote if it comes to that (so far it's the only bandwagon we have), but I'd need a good reason for putting on a third vote and making this a real bandwagon. Care to try convincing me, guys? Or is there as little to this as it seems?
|
|
|
Post by Yaw on Jan 3, 2004 18:13:28 GMT -5
On second thought...
pieisgood
I just read that post again. The hell?!? I'm getting vibes now that something's fishy between the three of you. Arutha and ck for reasons already stated, and pieisgood because of the above quote. It's not so much in what you've figured out, but the how. Without a night, I'm wondering how you could have figured out a lot of this game, especially with the inactivity. (Although, it must be stated, scum would know a lot.) I'm sort of perplexed by this. Fingers of suspicion (FOS) all around.
|
|
|
Post by Arutha on Jan 3, 2004 19:35:42 GMT -5
As afore mentioned what pieisgood has done is so far the most suspicious thing in my mind, except your theory about auntie so until i more real reasoning i shant change my vote plus ck does have the good point that he is very defensive and pointing alot of fingers rather than one his "choice" not to set a revenge vote could just be a way to draw attention away from the fact he is mafia, by not doing that he can have ck or myself killed this evening, it makes me worried to think i could die in my sleep. that is about all the reasoning i have, i have not seen any others more worth a lynch yet but it seems there needs to be one. changing my mind at this stage would make many think i was mafia myself. esecially when there is so little to decide who to vote for this round
|
|
|
Post by nonny on Jan 3, 2004 20:37:06 GMT -5
I will try to contact jacopo7531, if there are not enough votes o nthe deadline then i will extend it two days.
|
|
|
Post by pieisgood on Jan 3, 2004 20:47:11 GMT -5
yaw- the new roles are very interesting. The way people act will reflect them; and I think a few people have reflected that very well.
Arutha- Where am I pointing fingers? I have defended myself and only cast inactivity votes so far.
Also, not being willing to change your vote is pretty suspicious to me. Like I said, true citizens are willing to sacrifice themselves for the good of catching the mafia.
*sigh* if you are going to accuse me for not casting a revenge vote, why don't I cast a revenge vote and get accused anyways? Because I'm not scum, and I don't suspect you two of being scum, just very wrong citizens.
Should one of them get killed "tonight", that would prove nothing because any mafia in their right mind would kill them and I would be lynched next. Unless they're scum...
|
|
muddog
Maverick's Chew Toy
The blue things are books titles Plato, and the kid has a jar of Play-Doh
Posts: 29
|
Post by muddog on Jan 3, 2004 21:52:11 GMT -5
First off, pieisgood, thank you for removing your vote. Second, I agree with you that a true citizen would sacrifice themselves for the mafias extinction. This is my first time playing a RPG on a message bord, so I dont know what I should say or do. I am not a mafia, but have not seen substantial evidence that anyone so far is. I will review the posts, but for the moment I think that CK and Arutha might be siblings, working together for a common cause. Or maby I am wrong, and siblings would simply vote seperately and not draw attention to each other. Like I said, this is my first time playing a mafia game, so I am unfamerialer(pardon spelling) on what would happen. I do think that pieisgood is innocent, and being unfairly accused, though by his admission he has played this type of game before and may therefor be slippery if he is scum. I do belive that there is not enough evidence for a vote from me, so I will not vote as of this time.
|
|